A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sreedevi, B.
- Induction of Defense Enzymes in Trichoderma harzianum Treated Groundnut Plants against Macrophomina phaseolina
Authors
1 Department of Virology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 25, No 1 (2011), Pagination: 33–39Abstract
Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma harzianum isolated from the rhizosphere of groundnut was determined in vitro. T. harzianum decreased the ischolar_main rot incidence in vivo. Potential of T. harzianum to induce systemic resistance was tested in groundnut against Macrophomina phaseolina. Biochemical changes in T. harzianum treated plants, M. phaseolina inoculated plants and healthy plants were assayed at different stages of infection. Treatment with T. harzianum and challenge inoculation of M. phaseolina enhanced induction of defense enzymes such as peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and defense compounds like total phenol and ortho-dihydric phenol. Total phenols, ortho-dihydric phenols, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities increased at different stages of infection. T. harizanum treatment along with challenge inoculation of the pathogen significantly increased the activity of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase by about 28.2 % and 95.5%, respectively, in ischolar_mains at stage 2 compared to untreated plants. Increased levels of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase were induced in ischolar_main and shoot of treated plants indicating the systemic protection offered to groundnut by T. harzianum. The observations revealed that T. harzianum was capable of inducing systemic resistance against M. phaseolina by eliciting the production of defense enzymes.Keywords
Trichoderma harzianum, Macrophomina phaseolina,Total Phenols, Ortho-Dihydric Phenols, Peroxidase, Polyphenol Oxidase, Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR).References
- Abd-El-Kareem, F. 2007. Induced resistance in bean plants against ischolar_main rot and Alternaria leaf spot diseases using biotic and abiotic inducers under field conditions. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 3: 767– 774.
- Baker, R. 1988. Trichoderma spp. as plant stimulants. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 7: 97–106.
- Baker, R. 1989. Improved Trichoderma spp. for promoting crop productivity. Trends in Biotechnology, 7: 34–38.
- Bray, H. G. and Thorpe, W. V. 1954. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods in Biochemistry Analysis, 1: 27–52.
- Brunner, K., Zeilinger, S., Ciliento, R., Woo, L. S., Lorito, M., Kubicek, C. P. and Mach, R. L. 2005. Improvement of the fungal biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride to enhance both antagonism and induction of plant systemic disease resistance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 7: 3959–3969.
- Chérif, M., Arfaoui, A and Rhaiem, A. 2007. Phenolic compounds and their role in bio-control and resistance of chickpea to fungal pathogenic attacks. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 2: 7–21.
- Elad, Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Protection, 19: 709–714.
- Elad, Y., Chet, I. and Henis, Y. 1983. Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii – Scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology, 73: 85–88.
- Fehrman, H. and Diamond, A. E. 1967. Peroxidase activity and Phytophthora resistance in different organs of potato plant. Phytopathology, 57: 69–72.
- Haggag, W and Amin, A. W. 2001. Efficacy of Trichoderma species on control of Fusarium – rot, ischolar_main knot and reniform nematodes disease complex on sunflower. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4: 314–318.
- Hajieghrari, B., Torabi-Giglou, M., Mohammadi, M. R. and Davari, M. 2008. Biological potential of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates in control of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7: 967– 972.
- Harman, G. E. 2006. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology, 96: 190–194.
- Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I. and Lorito, M. 2004. Trichoderma species – opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Review, 2: 43–56.
- Hibar, K, Daami-Remadi, M. and El-Mahjoub, M. 2007. Induction of resistance in tomato plants Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici by Trichoderma spp. Tunisian Journal Plant Protection, 2: 47–58.
- Hoitink, H. A. J., Madden, L. V. and Dorrance, A. E. 2006. Systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma spp. Interactions between the host, the pathogen, the biocontrol agent, and soil organic matter quality. Phytopathology, 96: 186-189.
- Honson, L. E. and Howell, C. R. 2004. Elicitors of plant defence responses from biocontrol strains of Trichoderma virens. Phytopathology, 94: 171–176.
- Howell, C. R. 2003. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant disease. The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Diseases, 87: 4–10.
- Hoyos-Carvajal, L., Ordua, S. and Bissett, J. 2009. Growth stimulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Trichoderma. Biological Control, 51: 409–416.
- Johnson, G. and Schaal, L. A. 1957. Chlorogenic acid and orthodihyroxy phenols in scab resistant Russet Burbank and scab susceptible triumph potato tubers of different maturities. Phytopathology, 47: 253–258.
- Karthikeyan, M., Jayakumar, V., Radhika, K., Bhaskaran, R., Velazhahan, R. and Alice, D. 2005. Induction of resistance in host against the infection of leaf blight pathogen (Alternaria palandui) in onion (Allium cepa var aggregatum). Indian Journal Biochemistry and Biophysics, 42: 371–377.
- Kubicek, C. P., Mach, R. L., Peterbauer, C. K. and Lorito, M. 2001. Trichoderma: From genes to biocontrol. Journal of Plant Pathology, 83: 11–23.
- M piga P., Belanger, R. R, Paulitz, T. C and Benhamou, N. 1997. Increased resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis lycopersici in tomato plants treated with endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 50: 301–320.
- Mahadevan, A. and Sridhar, R. 1982. Methods in physiological plant pathology. 2nd Edition, Sivakami Publications, Chennai, India.
- Mehan, V. K. and McDonald, D. 1997. Charcoal Rot. In: Compendium of peanut diseases. 2nd edition. (N. Kokalis- Burelle et al.), APS Press. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. Mohammadi, M. and Karr, A. 2002. â–1, 3–glucanase and chitinase activities in soybean ischolar_main nodules. Journal of Plant Physiology, 159: 245–256.
- Nawar, H. F. and Kuti, J. D. 2003. Wyerone acid phytoalexin synthesis and peroxidase activity as markers for resistance of broad bean to chocolate spot disease. Journal of Phytopathology, 151: 564–570.
- Ousley, M. A., Lynch, J. M. and Whipps, J. M. 1994. Potential of Trichoderma spp. as consistent plant growth stimulators. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 17: 85–90.
- Perello, A., Monaco, C., Simon, M. R., Sisterna, M. and Dal Bello, G. 2003. Biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma isolates for tan spot of wheat in Argentina. Crop Protection, 22: 1099–1106.
- Podile, A. R. and Kishore, G. K. 2002. Biological control of peanut diseases, pp. 131–160. In: S.S. Gnanamanickam (Ed.). Biological control of crop diseases. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.
- Prasad, R. D., Rangeshwaran, R., Hegde, S. V. and Anuroop, C. P. 2002. Effect of soil and seed application of Trichoderma harzianum on pigeonpea wilt caused by Fusarium udum under field condition. Crop Protection, 21: 293–297.
- Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. 2002. Induction of defense related proteins in tomato ischolar_mains treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Journal of Plant and Soil, 239: 55–68.
- Shanmugaiah, V., Balasubramanian, N., Gomathinayagam, S., Manoharan, P. T. and Rajendran, A. 2009. Effect of single application of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth promotion in cotton plants. African Journal Agricultural Research, 4: 1220–1225.
- She-ze, Z., Fan, Z. and Bao-zhenl, H. S. 2008. Enhancement of phenylalanine ammonia lyase, polyphenoloxidase, and peroxidase in cucumber seedlings by Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation. Agricultural Sciences in China, 7: 82–87.
- Singh, R., Sindhan, G. S., Parashar, R. D. and Hooda, I. 1998. Application of antagonist in relation to dry ischolar_main rot and biochemical status of chickpea plants. Plant Disease Research, 13: 35–37.
- Sivakumar, G. and Sharma, R. C. 2003. Induced biochemical changes due to seed bacterization by Pseudomonas fluorescens in maize plants. Indian Phytopathology, 56: 134–137.
- Evaluation of Quality of Service Metrics for Hacking and Counter Hacking Mechanism in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Authors
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Srinivasa Ramanujan Centre, SASTRA University, Kumbakonam - 612001, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 8, No 23 (2015), Pagination:Abstract
Objectives: The work is to identify the Quality of Service metrics for mobile ad hoc networks during hacking and counter hacking mechanism. Methods: The various quality metrics such as end to end delay, throughput and packet delivery ratio is determined. The implementation is done using ns2 simulator with the nodes at random waypoint mobility model. The performance is measured during intruder attack and counter attack for 20 nodes with 1000 packets of 512 bytes size. Findings: The simulation results showed a significant increase in packet delivery ratio for counter attack mechanism (98) when compared with intruder attack, which gave least value (40.6). This work is also compared with Anti Black Hole Mechanism and is found to be efficient in terms of packet delivery ratio. Improvements: In this work, all the nodes are assumed to be of maximum energy in terms of its battery power. While routing the energy drops and this is a major issue in ad hoc nodes. The future work will focus on energy efficiency during routing process.Keywords
Anti-Black Hole Mechanism, Counter Attack, Intruder Attack, Packet Delivery Ratio, Quality of Service, Through Put.- Beta-Lactamase Antimicrobial Resistance in Klebsiella and Enterobacter Species Isolated from Healthy and Diarrheic Dogs in Andhra Pradesh, India
Authors
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, IN
Source
Veterinary World, Vol 10, No 8 (2017), Pagination: 950-954Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to characterize beta-lactamase antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella and Enterobacter species isolated from healthy and diarrheic dogs in Andhra Pradesh.Materials and Methods: A total of 136 rectal swabs were collected from healthy (92) and diarrheic (44) dogs, bacteriological cultured for Klebsiella and Enterobacter growth and screened for beta-lactamase antimicrobial resistance phenotypically by disc diffusion method and genotypically by polymerase chain reaction targeting blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, blaCTX-M Group 1, 2, blaAmpC, blaACC, and blaMOX genes.
Results: A total of 33 Klebsiella and 29 Enterobacter isolates were recovered. Phenotypic beta-lactamase resistance was detected in 66.6% and 25% of Klebsiella and Enterobacter isolates, respectively, from healthy dogs and 66.6% and 60% of Klebsiella and Enterobacter isolates, respectively, from diarrheic dogs. Overall, incidence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype was found to be 21.2% (7/33) in Klebsiella isolates, whereas none of the Enterobacter isolates exhibited ESBL phenotype. Predominant beta-lactamase genes detected in Klebsiella species include blaSHV (84.8%), followed by blaTEM (33.3%), blaCTX-M Group 1 (15.1%), and blaOXA (6.1%) gene. Predominant beta-lactamase genes detected in Enterobacter species include blaSHV (48.2%), followed by blaTEM (24.1%), blaAmpC (13.7%), and blaOXA (10.3%) gene.
Conclusion: The present study highlighted alarming beta-lactamase resistance in Klebsiella and Enterobacter species of canine origin in India with due emphasis as indicators of antimicrobial resistance.
Keywords
Beta-Lactamase Resistance, Dogs, Enterobacter, Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, Klebsiella.- Effect of Herbicides on Feeding, Survival and Development of Haltica cyanea, a Biocontrol Agent of Dicot Weed, Ammania baccifera L. in Rice Ecosystem
Authors
1 ICAR- Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 117-121Abstract
Ammania baccifera L. (Fam: Lathyraceae) is one of the predominant weeds in paddy fields. In nature, the adults and grubs of Haltica cyanea (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feed varaciously on the leaves of this weed leading to drying of the plants. In recent times with the gradual change in cultivation practices and increase in labour shortage the use of weedicides in rice ecosystem has increased tremendously. In an endeavour to explore the possibility of the use of these beetles as biocontrol agents, laboratory studies were carried out at ICAR-IIRR to compare the efficacy of H. cyanea as a biocontrol agent in comparison with the two recommended herbicides and also study the effect of these herbicides on the biology of the beetle. The two recommended herbicides, 2,4-D Na salt 80% (for broadleaved weeds) @800g a.i/ha and Metsulfuron methyl 10% + chlorimuron ethyl 10% WP (for broadleaved and sedges) @4ga.i/ha were tested against A. baccifera and the larval stages of H. cyanea. The effect of these herbicides on survival, feeding, longevity and biology of the bioagent was studied through leaf dip and pot spray method. It was observed that there was 21.67% reduction in shoot weight in beetle released plants as compared to herbicide treatment wherein 38.5-49.3% reduction in shoot weight was observed within 48h. Both the herbicides affected the biology of the insect and between the two herbicides, 2,4-D Na salt was more toxic to the grubs as compared to Metsulfuron methyl + chlorimuron ethyl.
Keywords
Ammania baccifera, Biocontrol Agent, Haltica cyanea (=Alticacyanea), Herbicides, Weed Control Efficiency.References
- Bhullar MS, Kumar S, Kaur S, Kaur T, Singh J, Yadav R, Chauhan BS, Gill G. 2016. Management of complex weed flora in dry-seeded rice. Crop Prot. 83: 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.01.012
- DRR. 1978-2010. DRR Progress Reports. Vol 3. All India Coordinated rice Improvement Project, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.
- Mitra S, Sarkar N, Barik A. 2017. Long-chain alkanes and fatty acids from Ludwigia octovalvis weed leaf surface waxes as short-range attractant and ovipositional stimulant to Altica cyanea (Weber) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Bull Entomol Res. 107: 391-400. 2017
- Moody K. 1989. Weeds reported in rice in south and southeast Asia. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines, 442 pp.
- Nayan Roy. 2018. Host preference and potency of Altica cyanea as a bio-control agent of major rice field weeds, Ludwigia spp. Int J Zool Stud. 3: 227-231.
- Nayek TK, Banerjee TC. 1987. Life history and host specificity of Altica cyanea [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae], a potential biological control agent for water primrose, Ludwigia adscendens. BioControl. 32: 407-414.
- Padmakumari AP, Pasalu IC. 2004. Altica cyanea Weber (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Ammania baccifera L. Insect Environ. 10: 110-111.
- Rao AN, Wani SP, Ahmed S, Haider Ali H and Marambe B. 2017. An Overview of Weeds and Weed Management in Rice of South Asia, pp. 247-281. In: Rao AN and Matsumoto H. (Eds.). Weed management in rice in the Asian-Pacific region. Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS); The Weed Science Society of Japan, Japan and Indian Society of Weed Science, India
- Soerjani M, Kostermans AJGH and Tjitrosoe Pomo G. 1987. Weeds of Rice in Indonesia. Balai Pustaka Jakarta, Indonesia, 716 pp.
- Sreedevi B, Krishnamurthy P, Mahender Kumar R and Viraktamath BC. 2012. A ready reckoner for rice weeds. Technical Bulletin No. 64, 105 pp.
- Vasudevan P, Manoharan S and Muthusamy J. 2014. An ethnomedical, pharmacological and phytochemical review of Ammania baccifera L. World J Pharm Res. 3(6): 1771-1789
- Xiao-Shui W. 1990. Altica cyanea (Col: Chrysomelidae) for the biological control of Ludwigia prostrate (Onagraceae) in China. Trop Pest Manage. 36: 368-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670879009371513